Saturday 19 April 2014

Solutions to April 2013 HIS242: Europe in the Twentieth Century Final Exam at University of Toronto Mississauga

This is a set of partial solutions to the April 2013 exam of this course at UTM.

April 2013 UTM Exam Solutions

PART ONE : ONE ESSAY

In the Doctrine of Fascism, Mussolini does not put forth a lot of positive doctrine. It is not a white paper that outlines what his policy will be in the next few decades. However, some of the imagery he uses is specifically targeted at evoking the Roman Empire. He also talks of how peace is a sign of indolent decadence, and the urge to imperial war (Nietzsche's “will to power”) is proof of fascism's vitality. Thus he does not directly state that he plans to conquer territory for the glory of fascist Italy, but he heavily implies it.
What he offered was a break with the past. The world was shaken after the Great War, the previously dominant scientific positivism was obviously untenable. People wanted a new ideology, because the doctrines of liberalism, socialism, and democracy had failed them; they had brought them to a low point. Fascism offered this simply through its deliberate repudiation of the past, and was swiftly adopted in Italy, Hungary, Austria, Germany, Poland, and most European countries with the exceptions of Britain, France, and Czechoslovakia. Communism also was appealing on this ground, its novelty propelled it to power in Russia where it stayed until it stagnated.
To accomplish this effect, the Doctrine sets forth very little description of what fascism is. Mussolini spends the bulk of his time talking about what fascism is not. He criticizes democracy for reducing the state to the will of the majority, in contrast fascism places the state as something higher than the people, an ideal that is more important than even the will of a large majority. There was also a sense throughout the war that parliamentary squabbling weakened democratic regimes, as is evident from Petain's report. This feeling would lead in France to the adoption of a constitution with a high level of executive control under de Gaulle. Further, he criticizes liberalism as inevitably leading to decadence. Liberalism was based on the idea that happiness can be achieved on earth, especially through science and capitalism. World War I cast doubt on this view, as the widespread death and destruction cast a shadow of sorrow over everything. Science and material conditions continued to advance throughout the 20th century in Europe, but this did not make problems of hatred and war vanish, as is shown by the recent Yugoslav wars, or the slightly less recent Algerian War.
Mussolini also gained popularity because he was seen as a force that could restore order. His bad of Black Shirt thugs fought communists in the street and burned the buildings of opposing parties. The government was weak and unable to control this, so the people felt insecure in the power of the democratic regime, and Mussolini's emphasis on authority seemed like the solution. He gained popularity by creating chaos, feeding into the widespread unemployment, crime, and poverty caused by the war, and then promising to restore order.
At that time, Italy had only been a unified country for decades. Mussolini's strength was seen by many as a force that could hold Italy together, and this they thought was necessary to ensure its continued relevance in international relations.
Mussolini raised national sentiments with imperial promises and conquests. Italian felt they had been treated unfairly by the agreements of the Paris Peace Conference. Like Romania, Italy joined the Allies largely for the promise of territorial gain at the expense of the Austro-Hungarian empire. They thought the Austrian Tyrol and parts of Dalmatia rightly belonged to Italy. Unlike Romania, they did not get it. The allies felt Italy's contribution to the war effort was not significant enough to warrant reward; they allowed national self-determination in the Tyrol at Italy's expense while violating this principle in awarding Romania Transylvania, Bessarabia, and Bukovna. Mussolini promised to claim this area by force, and this was a goal many Italians could get behind. Also, Italy had been humiliated in the Battle of Aduwa, being the first European nation to lose a war to a non-European nation: Abyssinia. Mussolini promised and delivered conquest in Ethiopia, his slaughter of Haile Selassie's subjects was unopposed by the League of Nations. The lack of international intervention, as well as the success itself, boosted Mussolini's prestige; Italian nationalists could point to this as evidence that other countries were now beginning to take Italy seriously, owing to Mussolini's fascism.
Mussolini's decline came when it became doubtful that the Axis would win World War II. The allies reclaimed North Africa in 1943, ousting Italian troops. Russia and America entered the war in 1941, and the Germans were sustaining heavy losses (95% of their wartime total) in the Soviet Union, at battles like those of Leningrad and Stalingrad. Italian troops had been forced out of Albania in 1943, when Mussolini was removed from office. Essentially, Mussolini lost power because Italy could not handle the war. The home front was collapsing, and the Allies had taken Italy, which was right on Italy's doorstep.
After the war, people were more favourable to moderate regimes, because they had seen the extremes to which fascist regimes could lead in Hitler's Germany. Knowledge of the Holocaust stigmatized fascism, as did American cold war propaganda campaigns against totalitarianism in general.
Fascism was based on the vitality that it advertised, and Mussolini stated that this vitality was the reason fascist governments were propelled to war. Thus, once the war efforts to conquer the rest of Europe failed, Mussolini's fascist government collapsed.
PART TWO: IDENTIFICATIONS
  1. Matteotti
Matteotti was an Italian socialist politician who criticized Mussolini's fascist regime in 1924. He accused them of committing electoral fraud, and denounced their use of the Black Shirt thugs to intimidate the populace and gain votes. As a result, Mussolini mentioned to some of his subordinates that it would be opportune if Matteotti should disappear. He did. This shows Mussolini's power, and emphasized the trait of totalitarian regimes, both fascist and communist, that they ban all dissenting views in order to completely dominate the inner political life of their subjects.

  1. Locarno Pact
The Locarno Pact was a treaty signed by Britain, France, Belgium, Italy, and Germany in 1925. It was designed to prevent any future conflict, and it reaffirmed Germany's postwar borders in the west. Germany also promised not to break the stipulations of the Treaty of Versailles. However, it left the question of Germany's eastern borders unresolved, and consequently the goals of German revisionists were to conquer the land east of Germany. There were renewed German claims to the Danzig, the Polish corridor, and upper Silesia. This can be seen by Hitler's talk of Lebensraum, followed by the annexation of Czechoslovakia, Poland, and Austria. The Locarno pact also informed Chamberlain's policy of appeasement, all the same leaders met at Munich. He was convinced that all of Europe's nations were committed to peace, because they were devastated by the first World War. This was not the case, and for most of the 1930's Hitler was able to use this expectation to prepare for war while talking peace. He violated the points of the Treaty of Versailles by expanding the army, occupying the Rhineland (March 1936), the Anschluss (March 1938), unopposed. Chamberlain would talk of the Locarno spirit in his defence of the Munich agreement.


  1. The Marshall Plan

The Marshall plan was also informed by the experience of the interwar period. After the first world war, governments became extremely austere and protectionist. The Marshall Plan specifically sought to implement a Keynesian policy by reducing trade barriers and providing stimulus.

  1. An Iron Curtain had Descended
Churchill said this in a speech shortly after the war (1946) while receiving an honorary degree at Westminster College in Fulton, Missouri, accompanied by U.S. President Harry Truman. He referred to the fact that the Soviet Union had not relinquished control of the eastern European countries that they had liberated during the war (Hungary, Romania, Poland, Czechoslovakia, GDR, Bulgaria) as Stalin had promised at the Potsdam peace conference of July 1945. Stalin had instead installed communist puppet governments in these states. The iron curtain became an important piece of imagery in the cold war period. It was symbolic of the isolation of communist countries from western culture, as communist governments increasingly prevented visits to or media and commerce from western countries, to ensure their people would not know how much better life was in the west. The eastern bloc experienced period shortages of basic goods and no political freedoms, while the west entered into the post war era of economic growth under liberal democracies. The Berlin Wall (1961) meshed nicely with this imagery, as it provided a physical manifestation of the curtain that prevented the flow of traffic.

  1. Stabbed in the back
Ludendorff and Hindenburg, the German army in general, invented the stab-in-the-back myth immediately after losing the war. This said that Germany did not lose the war for military reasons, but because they were betrayed by the home front. This was widely believed, especially by Germans who had fought on the east, where the Germans did win the war against Russia. Further, it provided a convenient excuse for the military leaders, like Hindenburg, who later went on to become important in Weimar politics. It allowed Germans to believe that they lived in the greatest country, and lost not through their own faults, but because of betrayal. The idea of the home front originated in World War I, as it was the first war large scale enough to require the constant efforts of the entire population. Specifically, in the years of Hitler's ascension, the Jews were blamed for Germany's loss. A study was commissioned that reported on how involved the Jewish members of the population were with the war effort, in an attempt to prove that they did not contribute. The study found that Jews had contributed more than other sectors of the population, but the results were suppressed. The perception of Jews as traitors became more important to ideologues than the realities of the situation. This led to the Nuremberg Laws (1935), Gleischaltung, Kristallnacht (1938), and later the final solution and Holocaust. It allowed Hitler's rise to power by giving him a means to scapegoat a section of the population.
Also the Freikorps were made of eastern soldiers who returned thinking they had one, and then accepted this myth as the reason for Germany's losing the war. They went on to vindictively fight against communism in eastern Europe, as the communists were one of the groups blamed for Germany's defeat. This would prevent communist governments from taking root in east Europe in the interwar period, and contribute to the rise of fascist governments instead, as the Freikorps were extremely right wing.

  1. Night of the Long Knives
After Hitler assumed the title of power, he had to consolidate his power before he was able to go to war and carry out the Holocaust. Similar to Mussolini's Black Shirts, Hitler had made use of a band of paramilitary thugs, the Brown Shirts or Stormtroopers (SA), to fight communists in the street. They created disorder so that Hitler could be elected on the promise of restoring order. They were led by Ernst Rohm, and they represented a legitimate threat to Hitler's authority, as Rohm commanded a good deal of authority himself. On the Night (1934), Hitler had his new force, the SS under Himmler, execute Rohm, as well as other key political opponents, like those loyal to Vice-Chancellor Franz von Papen. Papen was one of the politicians behind Hitler's rise, thinking he could control him. Consequently, Hitler had the undivided allegiance of all the major players in German politics: the Wehrmacht, politicians, and industry (because his expansionist fiscal policies were good for business). The army was becoming offended by the disorder created by Nazi street fighting. Now that Hitler had used the street fighting to achieve power, he had no need for it and wanted to distance himself from ruffians in order to attract the support of the more conservative members of the army. He used this power to execute his own policies, sometimes against what the public wanted, including the takeover of Czechoslovakia in March 1939, and the subsequent attack on Poland (1 September 1939), which led to the second World War. Like in Mussolini's case, incumbent politicians had appointed Hitler to a position of power, thinking they could use him to restore order and then dispose of him, but had been outwitted by his ability to consolidate power once in office.

    1. Five Year Plan 1928
This refers to Stalin's economic policy after becoming head of the communist party following Lenin's death in 1924. It took Stalin until this time to consolidate power in the party by defeating challengers like Trotsky. Stalin's focus was on massive forced industrialization. Industrialization had happened naturally in the capitalist west, the UK, the Netherlands, and Germany being the archetypal examples. Russia, however, had remained largely industrially underdeveloped until the October Revolution, and this was one of the reasons for its defeat by Germany in the war. Stalin thought that the most important step to take to make Russia's largely agricultural economy competitive on the world stage was to force farmers to move to industrial towns and start working in new factories.
This policy also nicely fit in with official communist ideology. Marxism focuses on the class of the industrial proletariat, factory workers, and this class can only exist in an industrialized country. As in China later, Soviet communism was based on the demand of a large and only recently emancipated peasant class for land reform. Thus, Stalin thought he could bring about the next stage in the evolution of a communist society by forcibly creating a proletariat class. With them, he could enjoy immense support that would legitimate his recent ascension to power. Notably, this plan involved no efforts to foster global socialist revolution, as did Lenin's Comintern and his use of the Red Army to attempt to conquer eastern Europe in 1920. Stalin's focus was entirely on building “communism in one country”, planning to deal later with the problem of winning over the rest of the world by example, and by a modern military supplied by a booming industrial sector.
Because of his intention to shift Russia from an agricultural to an industrial society, Stalin had to forcibly remove peasants from their farms. Many peasants were unhappy at being forced to change professions from the one they had held all their lives. He seized the land of all of these peasants and forced them to work on massive collectivized farms, where they could be supervised to makes sure they were not hoarding any produce to sell for private gain. Those that resisted were sent to the Gulag or liquidated, the term that was used for the genocide of the manufactured “kulak” class of wealthy peasants. In fact, Stalin's victimization of this class was for private gain rather than ideological consistency, confiscated goods and wealth paid Party member salaries and built state-owned factories.
The Plan greatly increased Soviet industrial capacity, and modernized the Soviet economy, giving them the economic backbone that garnered international respect and allowed them to win World War II. However, agriculture suffered. The collectivized farms were far less productive than individual agriculture, likely because peasants lacked incentive to increase productivity. Peasant incentive had been the driving force behind improvement in agricultural techniques for all world history, and it was foolish for Stalin to abandon it. What's more, the resistance itself was a problem. People would often burn their property and livestock rather than yield it to the communists. Many workers who were formerly producing food were instead breaking rocks in the Gulag. Thus, massive food shortages resulted and millions died or were imprisoned. Economic dissatisfaction contributed to the collapse of communism.
Part THREE: Multiple Choice

  1. Field Marshal Hindenburg said Germany was stabbed in the back (he was a royalist, it was against his will that he advised the Kaiser to abdicate)
  2. Gustave Stresemann called the Locarno conference
  3. Kellogg-Briand pact agreed to pacifist resolution of international disagreements
  4. The Lateran Accords were seen as a sell-out by the Church for tax benefits
  5. Benito Mussolini moved his army to the Brenner pass in 1934 to keep Hitler out of Austria
  6. Volkische Beobachter was the voice of the NSDAP
  7. Ferdinand Porsche designed the Volkswagen beetle.
  8. Sophie Scholl said a crime has been perpetrated against human beings.
  9. Rudolf Hess said Hitler is Germany and Germany is Hitler
  10. Neville Chamberlain said we have a clear conscience
  11. Josef Stalin said the development of capitalism takes place through war and catastrophe
  12. President Truman said totalitarian regimes are nurtured by misery and want
  13. Walter Ulbricht ruled East Germany with the Party and 20 Russian divisions
  14. Winston Churchill said we must proclaim the principles of freedom and human rights
  15. Simone de Beauvoir said there can be no real mass movement without women
  16. Brezhnev said the USSR had to act decisively against Czech nationalism
  17. Robert Schumann integrated French and West German coal and steel production
  18. Charles de Gaulle vetoed British entry into the EEC
  19. Nikita Krushchev said we are resolutely opposed to the arms race
  20. Mikhail Gorbachev supported the sovereignty of the Soviet republics within the federal nation.

No comments:

Post a Comment