Thursday 17 April 2014

Solutions to April 2013 HIS242: Europe in the Twentieth Century Final Exam at University of Toronto St. George.

I'm currently going through old exams as part of my studying process. As a result, I've got extra sets of solutions on my hands, and it would be a shame to let them go to waste. Please excuse the lack of writing style, I'm trying to simulate exam writing conditions.

April 2013 Exam, St. George

1) Essay
This passage is from British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain's speech to parliament in defence of his decision to sign the Munich agreement in October of 1938. The events were as follows: In March of that year, Hitler executed the Anschluss, in which he claimed Austria as part of Germany. This was forbidden by the Treaty of Versailles to limit German power; overturning measures such as these won Hitler popular German nationalist support. It went over relatively smoothly, as the population of Austria was majority German speaking, and the Nazi party had wide support therein. In contrast, his desire to annex Czechoslovakia met fierce resistance, both in that country and internationally. The Sudetenland, the northern region of Czechoslovakia, was a thriving industrial region, and was very important for the strategic defence of Czechoslovakia. For months before this speech, Hitler and the Nazi party had been purposefully inciting incidents through the Nazi party in the Sudetenland, riots, run-ins with Czech police. The region was majority ethnic German.
Hitler first made a set of more reasonable demands, known as the Karlsbader Programm, for the peaceful transition of the region to autonomy and then German control. He alleged that the Czechoslovak government was abusing Sudeten Germans. These were agreed to by the British, French, and Czechs in the summer. Subsequently, having seen that he would meet little resistance, Hitler made a series of more extreme demands at Bad Godesberg in mid-September, threatening forcible takeover of the area if they were not met. At the Munich conference, Britain and France accepted Hitler's Godesberg demands on September 30. This is the agreement to which the speech refere.
France and Britain were the key players because France had a defence treaty with Czechoslovakia, and would be obliged to go to war with Germany if Hitler attacked Czechoslovakia. The French, however, were cautious about standing up to Germany because they were not certain of British support in the event of war. Also, the French overestimated the strength of the German military (as shown by their allowing Germany to break the Treaty of Versailles and occupy the Rhineland), and were generally indecisive due to the quibbling of a weak parliament (the third republic, whose inefficacy de Gaulle asserts and is shown by their capitulation early in WW2). Moreover, France and Britain both had disarmed in the interwar period, hoping for peace in accordance with the Treaty of Locarno (1925) and Kellogg-Briand Pact (1928), as they focused on economic reconstruction and dealt with the great depression.
Chamberlain's doctrine of appeasement, allowing concessions to dictators like Hitler and Mussolini in the hope of avoiding war, came under harsh criticism in retrospect, as it proved ineffective in ultimately preventing the outbreak of World War II. However, at the time, it was not so easy to foresee appeasement's disastrous effects, and it enjoyed plentiful popular support. Chamberlain saw Munich as a triumph of the European international system's ability to resolve conflicts without American or Soviet intervention, as shown by the textrl. The people of Europe were war-weary from the first World War, which was still very vivid in people's memories. Indeed, even the people of Germany did not want a war, there is strong historical evidence that this was only the goal of Hitler, who had the unique goal of enslaving the world due to ideology of racial supremacy (Race and Space, Lebensraum). Chamberlain believed the benefits of possibly avoiding World War were greater than the risks of yielding the Sudetenland to Hitler; hindsight itself cannot disprove this. No one knew at the time how committed Hitler was to war.
Furthermore, the above-mentioned demilitarization means that it would have been extremely disadvantageous for France and Britain to go to war in October 1938. Hitler had been fervently rearming since his accession in 1934, and the German Army was by far the most technologically advanced in the continent; the Soviets had them outmanned. Even though the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact was not signed until August of 1939, the USSR would likely not have entered a war between the UK, France, Czechoslovakia, and Germany. The Soviets would have seized the opportunity to let their enemies, all western capitalist nations, weaken themselves and each other over Czechoslovakia, which they viewed as insignificant. The allies would probably have been swiftly crushed. France was defeated quickly anyway when war did break out, by June 1940, even though it had more than a year after Munich to prepare its army. Hitler was obsessed throughout his life with timing, thinking that he had missed his chance to rise to power in the early 1930s when the NSDAP vote share fell from one year to the next, and wondered afterwards whether he ought have gone to war in 1938 when his foes were less ready. Chamberlain's policies may have been the reason for allied victory, also allowing the British army to build itself up enough to hold out long enough for the Soviets and the Americans to enter the war.
In many ways this occurrence highlights the influence that the first World War had on the second. The strategy of appeasement would have been inconceivable in the 19th century, when tensions ran so hot that world empires would go to war over the assassination of a minor member of the Austrian royal family (Franz Ferdinand), and the UK would enter the war over Germany's violation of the Belgian neutrality. The great force of the Great War in modern memory accounts for why Britain would not go to war over Germany's violation of Czechoslovakia's neutrality.
Further, the Paris Peace Conference of 1920 was allegedly drawn up in accordance with the principle of national self-determination. This was the official view expounded by American President Woodrow Wilson's 14 points of peace, which played a key part in the discussion. Due to this, Germany felt excluded from the just desserts of the War. Many large ethnic German minorities were locked up, in the Danzig, Austria, and the Sudetenland. Further, large parts of Hungary with large Hungarian majorities were given to Romania to reward her for fighting on the allied side. The treatment of Germany's colonies was not different, the victorious allies did not give these nations independent status, but instead distributed them among the existing colonial empires. Defeated central powers rightly felt that self-determination was meaningless rhetoric that the Entente used to divide up the lands of the defeated central powers as spoils of war. On the basis of this hypocrisy, Hitler had reasonable grounds for claiming the Sudetenland; the Sudeten Germans nationally determined that they wanted to be a part of Germany. Hitler self-consciously titled one set of his demands the fourteen points after Woodrow Wilson's. Hitler's goal was not honest, because in March of the next year, he invaded the rest of Czechoslovakia and set up a Czech protectorate (The Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia) and a Slovakian puppet state (the Slovak Republic), ruling over other ethnicities for the benefit of Germans, not granting national self-determination to any people but his own. Thus it was only a convenient excuse, afforded by hypocritical actions of the allies after WW1.
Mussolini was perhaps also appeased, when we waged war against Empress Haile Selassie's Ethiopia (then Abyssinia) as revenge for Italy's humiliation in the Battle of Aduwa in the previous decade. The League of Nations did not intervene, effectively letting Mussolini have Ethipia in hopes that he might not make trouble in Europe. This failed as well, as Mussolini joined the Axis. The inefficacy of the League of Nations in this instance was one of the factors that contributed to its dissolution after WW2 in 1946. There was then pressure on the United Nations that would inform their decisions to intervene in the Vietnam War, the Bosnian and Croation Wars of Independence (bombing Serbia), and the war in Kosovo (also bombing Serbia).
Also, the example of the failed attempt to appease Hitler and Mussolini informed the doctrine of containment that the US took toward the USSR as part of the interventionist Truman Doctrine. The US viewed the USSR as a hostile entity that could not be reasoned with, and the only prudent course of action was to try and prevent them from gaining any countries beyond what they got during the War (Poland, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, GDR, Romania, Albania, Bulgaria). The fear was that once one country fell, the rest would fall like dominos. This is an intentionally stark break with Chamberlain's appeasement, as the US and Western European countries were unwilling to grant the USSR any territorial gain at all, for fear that this would embolden them to take actions similar to Hitlers. Thus, the US and NATO found themselves involved in many seemingly insignificant countries (that they would otherwise not interfere with) like Greece (1946-9), Korea (1950-3), Vietnam (1945-54, 1956-45), Afghanistan (1979-89), propping up any anticommunist regime – no matter how fascistic – just to not be seen as appeasing Soviets.

2) Terms ID and Significance

Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact:
This was the non-aggression pact signed between Hitler's Germany and Soviet Russia in August of 1939, roughly one week before the beginning of the war. In it, both parties agreed not to attack each other if the other party should go to war. In the secret appendix, they agreed to partition Poland between Nazi and Soviet spheres of influence. It was signed in Moscow by German Foreign Minister Ribbentrop and Soviet Foreign Minister Molotov. It also announced the Soviet intent to invade Finland in the Winter War.
It was significant because with this in hand, the Germans could safely pursue an attack on France, and by the Anglo-French Alliance Britain, which they did a week later. The Soviets were the most powerful military force on the continent, and they could have been a major problem for Hitler if they had intervened early. This is shown by the fact that once Hitler did violate the Pact in 1941, Operation Barbarossa directly led to 95% of German casualties and the Axis defeat.
Further, it was in Poland that many of the practices that came to define the Holocaust were first implemented. Ghettoization, liquidation, putting Jews in charge of administrating their own imprisonment. All this would be implemented as the Germans marched into east Europe after 1941.
Also, this began the tradition of Soviet domination of Poland, and many other eastern European nations, that would continue until the collapse of communism in 1991 (Poland was liberated by Solidarity in Sept 1989). The Soviet Union wanted to dominate Poland so that they could rule it as a communist puppet state. Indeed, in 1944, when the Polish Home Army (The third largest allied military force) rose against the occupying Wehrmacht, the Soviet Army stood across the banks of the Vistula and watched. A Soviet air base 5 minutes away sent no aid. They wanted Poland weak so that they could dominate it after the war, as they did with Hungary, Czechoslovakia, and the GDR. The Pact gave Stalin freedom to pursue this course of action.
Stalin was also able to pursue a war against Finland in the North. Though this proved unsuccessful, the Soviet inability to crush the Finnish was seen as weakness by Hitler, and informed his decision to invade Russia, which ultimately lost him the war.

Marshall Plan:
The Marshall Plan was the system of financial aid that the US gave to help rebuild Europe after WW2. Much of the money went to food. The recipients were most western European countries.
The significance was that it deepened the divide between western and eastern European nations that already existed in the ideological difference between capitalism and communism. The USSR was offered money under the plan, but they refused because t hey did not want to allow the concomitant American control of their economy. They also prohibited any of the Eastern Bloc countries from accepting. The Russians had already been excluded from the Lend-Lease Act, even though the Americans promised to include them. This further exclusion, blamed on the Americans because of their “unreasonable” terms further damaged American-Soviet relations.
It also marks a shift in world power. The first world war weakend Europe to the extent that its countries had some economic trouble. The second World War decimated Europe to the extent that it was extremely reliant on America to rebuild it.
Further, the Marshall Plan led to the creation of the Organization for European Economic Cooperation (OEEC) in 1948 to administer its funds. This was the first pan-European (partially) decision making body, and paved the way for the ECSC (1952), the EEC (1957), and eventually the EU (2009). This organization showed that European countries were capable of working together, and as a result they opted for tight integration to prevent further wars. Organizations were formed of old enemies, such as France and Germany, also France and Italy, in the ECSC.

Francisco Franco:
Francisco Franco was the right-wing dictator of Spain from the end of the Spanish Civil War (1936-9) to his death in 1975. He began as Spain's youngest general, and came to command the Nationalist army against the Republicans, led by the Popular front.
The Spanish Civil War was an ideological battleground for the forces of liberal democracy that dominated France, Britain, and Czechoslovakia, and the new political ideology of fascism that rose to power in all other European nations (except in the USSR) in the interwar period. The republicans received material support from the Soviet Union, and had many British volunteers. The Nationalists received military support from Fascist Italy and Nazi Germany. This helped make the two sides more hostile towards each other, and led to the war.
Further, Hitler took advantage of the opportunity to test the Luftwaffe, his air forces, especially in the bombing of Guernica – a civilian town. This showed that Germany's army, especially the air force, was the most advanced in Europe at the time, and intimidated France and Britain into policies of appeasement; they did not want to directly challenge Hitler, and handed him Austria, the Rhineland, the Sudetenland, and the lifting of military restrictions, without a fight. This also convinced the British of the need to modernize the RAF, which they did in time to do well enough in the Battle of Britain to prevent an amphibious invasion.
This war solidified the ties between the fascist leaders Hitler and Mussolini, though Francisco refused to fight in WW2, citing his nation's poverty.
Existentialism:
Existentialism was a philosophy of life that emerged with the writings of French philosophers Jean-Paul Sartre and Simone de Beauvoir after WW2, and had its foundations in late 19th century Danish philosopher Soren Kierkegaarde and German Friedrich Nietzsche. It put an emphasis on absolute human freedom of choice to create identity, and the tremendous responsibility arising from that choice.
It was significant because it gave people a way of dealing with the aftermath of the war. People needed to forget parts of the past, the war, and a philosophy where you can choose to redefine your past at any moment renders the past insignificant. Further, the emphasis on anguish and difficulty meshed well with the feelings of people after the war. People in the war had to make difficult choices.
One concrete example is from Sartre's life, the French had to choose whether to collaborate with Petain's Vichy Regime or to join de Gaulle's Free French Army and resist. Sartre himself resisted. Existentialism provided a basis for indicting collaborators, they cannot use the excuse that they had no choice because whatever they did, they made a deliberate free choice to do. They could have joined the resistance. Thus, existentialism informed punishment of collaborators in France and abroad, where Sartre's writings found a place.
Existentialism also meshed nicely with de Beauvoir's creation of the second wave feminist women. By emphasizing free choice, existentialism minimized the biological aspects of personality. Thus, “woman” was a social construct, and all the concomitant behaviour was the result of choices that women made. It liberated them by telling them they could simply choose to do different things, empowering women to do what they want, and encouraging feminist's to campaign for a world where women have equal opportunity to choose their lives.

Vaclav Havel:
Vaclav Havel was a playwright who published Charter 77 (1977), a document demanding basic human rights in Soviet dominated communist Czechoslovakia. He was also a leading figure in the Velvet Revolution (1989), where Czechoslovakia gained independence non-violently as part of the collapse of communism, and the Velvet Divorce, where Slovakia separated from the Czech Republic. He was the first president of the Czech Republic, and the last of Czechoslovakia.
He was significant because he showed how fragile Communism had become. Collapse must have been in the air, for Czechoslovakia to receive independence without firing a shot in only 10 days (roughly). The previous attempt at liberalizing reforms, the Prague Spring (1968), met with Soviet military intervention. Soviet Communist Party Secretary Mikhail Gorbachev's glasnost (openness) and perestroika (restructuring) had real effects, the USSR was committed to non-intervention in eastern bloc countries in a way that it was not only 20 years ago. He inspired Bulgaria and Romania to throw off communist regimes later in that year.
His human rights campaigns revealed problems with communism. If communism was working in the eastern bloc, there would not have been need to militarily repress protests. Official “apparatchiks” received luxury goods while non-party members suffered shortages of basic necessity. Discontent led to the collapse of communism.
The velvet divorce may have been the result of Hitler's division of the federation into two protectorates during WW2.

3) Put in Chronological Order.

Warsaw Ghetto Uprising
Death of Adolf Hitler
VE Day (Victory in Europe Day)
Death of Josef Stalin

Potsdam Conference
Cuban Missile Crisis
Gorbachev named General Secretary of Communist Party in USSR
German Reunification

Russo-Japanese War
German Loss of Colonies in West Africa
Suez Canal Crisis 1956
Official End of Algerian War of Independence 1963



  1. Matching
Simone de Beauvoir
Frank Caplan
Andrey Sakharov
Warsaw Pact
T-4

  1. Multiple Choice
  1. f
  2. a
  3. b
  4. c
  5. e

No comments:

Post a Comment